00
Executive summary
The report opens with the decision, then lets the model data support it.
Use this page to state the recommended performance path in plain language: which variant is preferred, why it is technically viable, and where the remaining design risks live.
The starter report remains buildable before the first PHPP scrape. Edit project metadata
in project.yaml, write the client-facing narrative in MDX, and let generated
CSV data flow through data/.
Keep high-stakes caveats here: overheating risk, airtightness assumptions, certification path uncertainty, or cost/constructability tradeoffs that could change the recommendation.
01
Energy model
Compare design variants against site energy, source energy, demand, and certification limits.
This page follows the BLDGTYP Standard mockup: a concise narrative lead, chart-first evidence, and tables that stay close to the PHPP-derived source rows.
Use the copy above each chart to explain the result, not to restate every number. The chart and table components below are pulled directly from the shared report kit.
No site-energy rows are available yet.
No Primary Energy rows are available yet.
No heating demand-detail rows are available yet.
No monthly climate rows are available yet.
No result/limit certification rows are available yet.
No energy rows are available yet.
No certification rows are available yet.
02
Model geometry
Establish the modeled building before comparing envelope options.
Summarize the enclosure strategy: target U-values, continuity of the control layers, thermal-bridge assumptions, and construction risks that affect Passive House performance.
Keep PHPP-derived values in the workbook. Use this section for interpretation, not a second source of truth.
No building-metrics rows are available yet.
No matching variant input rows are available yet.
03
Assemblies
Show the construction logic behind the modeled R-values and psi-values.
Describe the roof, wall, slab, and foundation assemblies here. Reference thermal bridge simulations, psi-values, and constructability notes where they drive the recommendation.
04
Windows
Use glazing data to connect performance, comfort, and summer solar control.
Use this section for window package assumptions, installed U-value, SHGC, frame strategy, shading, and comfort risks around large glazed areas.
05
Mechanical
Keep systems assumptions legible without turning the client report into a schedule dump.
Record the ventilation concept, heating/cooling approach, DHW assumptions, and equipment sensitivities. For multifamily work, separate dwelling-unit ventilation assumptions from central plant and corridor/amenity assumptions.
No supply or extract room airflow rows are available yet.
No room-airflow rows are available yet.
06
Appendix
Keep traceability available, but out of the primary decision narrative.
Appendix content should help reviewers connect report claims back to PHPP rows, source PDFs, and model assumptions without making the main client narrative too dense.
No energy rows are available yet.
No matching variant input rows are available yet.